The Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America: A Strategic Analysis of Economic Exploitation and Debt Diplomacy

The Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America: A Strategic Analysis of Economic Exploitation and Debt Diplomacy

China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is reshaping Latin America's economic landscape through significant infrastructure investments. However, these projects often come with opaque terms and heavy debt burdens, raising concerns about economic dependency and compromised sovereignty. Understanding the BRI's impact is crucial for assessing the region's future stability and geopolitical alignment.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has made significant inroads into Latin America, reshaping the region’s economic landscape through substantial infrastructure investments. While these projects on the surface are designed to enhance connectivity and economic growth, they raise concerns about economic dependency, compromised sovereignty, and strategic leverage. China’s extensive financial involvement in countries like Ecuador, Chile, Venezuela, and Peru often comes with opaque terms and conditions, leading to debt burdens that could influence national policies and undermine local autonomy. As China seeks to secure access to natural resources and expand its geopolitical influence, understanding the implications of the BRI in Latin America is crucial for assessing the region’s future stability and alignment on the global stage​. [Council on Foreign Relations,​​ Atlantic Council,​ IISS, Council on Foreign Relations,​ Brookings]

BRI Background

Chinese President Xi Jinping launched the BRI in 2013 as a global development strategy to enhance regional connectivity and economic integration. Originally focused on reviving the ancient Silk Road trade routes, the BRI has expanded to include over 140 countries with infrastructure projects such as roads, railways, ports, and energy pipelines. The primary objectives of the BRI are to boost trade and investment, promote economic cooperation, and strengthen China’s geopolitical influence globally.​ [Atlantic Council,​​ Council on Foreign Relations]

Soon after its launch, China expanded the BRI into Latin America, with memoranda of understanding signed with countries such as Chile, Peru, and Venezuela. By 2023, 21 Latin American countries had joined the BRI. This expansion is part of China’s broader strategy to secure access to natural resources, open new markets for Chinese goods, and cultivate political alliances.​ [Council on Foreign Relations,​​ Diálogo Político]

China has multifaceted strategic interests in Latin America that are driven by economic, geopolitical, and ideological considerations. Economically, Latin America is rich in natural resources such as oil, copper, soybeans, and lithium, which are needed for China’s industrial and technological activity. The region offers markets for Chinese manufactured goods, helping offset domestic overproduction (see Figure 1). Geopolitically, strengthening ties with Latin American countries helps China to counterbalance U.S. influence in the region, potentially gaining strategic footholds close to the U.S. mainland. Ideologically, China seeks to promote its model of development and governance as an alternative to Western liberal democracy, which resonates with several Latin American countries facing political and economic challenges​. [Council on Foreign Relations,​​ United States Institute of Peace,​​ Council on Foreign Relations]

By weaving economic incentives with strategic investments, China can solidify its presence and influence in Latin America, using the BRI as a vehicle to achieve these broader goals. The increasing involvement of Chinese state-owned enterprises in key sectors, coupled with substantial financial loans, underscores the depth of China’s commitment to expanding its reach across the continent​. [Council on Foreign Relations,​​ Diálogo Político]

Figure 1: U.S. and Chinese trade with Latin America. Source: ©2023 World Integrated Trade Solution, Council on Foreign Relations.

Ecuador: A Case Study of Economic Exploitation through BRI

Since joining the BRI, Ecuador has received significant Chinese investments, primarily in its oil infrastructure. China’s involvement in Ecuador has been substantial, with state-owned enterprises like Sinopec and PetroChina securing contracts that allow the Chinese to control up to 90% of Ecuador’s oil exports. Such a high level of control raises concerns about Ecuador’s economic sovereignty. Chinese loans are often shrouded in secrecy, with terms not fully disclosed, leading to fears that Ecuador might be forced to drill in protected areas if it cannot meet its debt obligations. [Columbia Political Review, Oxford Business Group]

In 2022, Ecuador signed a free trade agreement with China, aimed at boosting non-oil exports by $3-4 billion over the next decade. Despite this, Ecuador’s debt to China is a considerable portion of its GDP, and servicing this debt has become a substantial financial burden.​ [Oxford Business Group]

The debt agreements often include clauses that could allow Chinese companies to seize Ecuadorian assets if debts are not repaid (Figure 2 shows Ecuadorian energy infrastructure with ties to China). For example, in 2014, it was revealed that PetroChina had the right to take over certain assets if Ecuador defaulted. This potential loss of control over critical national resources poses a severe threat to Ecuador’s sovereignty. Moreover, the push to exploit natural resources to meet debt obligations could lead to environmental degradation, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. [Columbia Political Review, Hudson Institute]

Figure 2: Energy-related projects connected to China. Source: © 2024 3GIMBALS.

The influx of Chinese megaprojects in Ecuador has also had significant social impacts. Often, these projects employ Chinese workers instead of local labor, leading to displacement and increased unemployment among Ecuadorians. This practice not only undermines local job markets but also exacerbates social tensions within affected communities. [Columbia Political Review, Oxford Business Group]

Recognizing the unsustainable nature of its debt to China, Ecuador has sought to restructure its financial obligations with the help of international organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United States Development Finance Corporation. President Guillermo Lasso has been proactive in seeking alternatives to Chinese financing to avoid further erosion of the country’s economic sovereignty.​ [Columbia Political Review, Hudson Institute]

The heavy reliance on Chinese loans and the subsequent control over national resources highlight the potential for economic and political leverage. For the United States and its allies, Ecuador’s situation underscores the importance of offering viable financial alternatives to counterbalance China’s growing influence in the region. By understanding these dynamics, policymakers can better address the strategic implications of China’s BRI in Latin America and develop strategies to support countries like Ecuador in achieving sustainable economic growth without compromising their sovereignty.

Chile: Heavy Reliance on Chinese Mining Companies Lead to Environmental Degradation

Chile’s involvement with China under the BRI has focused significantly on the mining sector, particularly lithium, which is crucial for the global electric vehicle (EV) market. Since joining the BRI in 2018, Chile has seen substantial Chinese investments aimed at tapping into its vast lithium reserves. China’s Tsingshan Holding Group, for example, announced a $233 million investment to establish a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) production plant in Chile’s Antofagasta region. This plant, scheduled to be operational by 2025, is expected to produce 120,000 tonnes of LFP annually.​ [Mining Technology, Chile Today]

The Chilean government has implemented a new strategy to increase state control over lithium production, aiming to balance public-private partnerships. This policy shift intends to grant lithium exploration and exploitation permits primarily to state entities like Codelco and Enami, with the possibility of partnering with private companies. This approach reflects Chile’s strategic move to ensure that lithium, a vital resource for the energy transition, remains under national oversight while still attracting foreign investment​. [Mining,​​ CGEP]

The heavy reliance on Chinese companies and the significant control they wield over strategic resources like lithium have raised sovereignty concerns. The environmental impact of lithium extraction, particularly from the Atacama salt flats (see Figure 3), has been a point of contention. The Chilean government’s new strategy includes measures to address these environmental concerns while attempting to maximize the economic benefits from its lithium reserves. [Mining,​​ CGEP]

Figure 3: Lithium-mining brine operations in Atacama. Source: © 2024 Wikimedia Commons.

China’s role as Chile’s largest trading partner has both positive and negative implications. On the one hand, Chinese investments have contributed to economic growth and job creation, particularly in the mining and renewable energy sectors. On the other hand, there are concerns about economic dependency and the potential for exploitation. The presence of Chinese companies in key sectors such as telecommunications and public utilities underscores the extent of China’s influence in Chile​. [Chile Today,​​ BORGEN]

For the United States and its allies, the growing Chinese presence in Chile represents a strategic challenge. While Chinese investments have driven economic growth, they also enhance Beijing’s influence over critical industries and resources. This dynamic necessitates a strategic response to offer competitive alternatives and support sustainable development in Chile and the broader Latin American region. Further, as the demand for natural resources increase around the globe (see Figure 4), China’s dominance in global mining supply chains pose significant strategic risks.

Figure 4: Global lithium demand projections. Source: © 2024 Cochilco.

Venezuela: Chinese Debt Diplomacy in Action

Venezuela has been one of the largest recipients of Chinese investments under the BRI, with a focus on the oil sector. This partnership has seen China invest heavily in Venezuela’s infrastructure, particularly in oil exploration and production. These investments have come with significant financial implications, as Venezuela owes over $60 billion to Chinese state-owned enterprises, primarily in the form of oil-backed loans. [Modern Diplomacy,​​ OilPrice.com]​

The debt agreements between China and Venezuela often include collateral arrangements that grant Chinese companies substantial control over Venezuelan oil exports. These deals are typically opaque, with limited public disclosure of terms, exacerbating concerns about sovereignty and economic stability. The reliance on oil exports to service Venezuela’s massive debt has forced Venezuela to prioritize these shipments to China, often at the expense of domestic needs and economic diversification, contributing to the country’s ongoing economic and humanitarian crises​.​ [World Economic Forum,​ Center For Global Development, Modern Diplomacy, Hudson Institute]

In 2023, China and Venezuela further deepened their cooperation by signing several new bilateral agreements during President Nicolás Maduro’s visit to Beijing (see Figure 5). These agreements span various sectors, including infrastructure, trade, and tourism, reinforcing the strategic partnership between the two countries. China’s continued investments are seen as crucial for Venezuela’s economic recovery, but they also solidify China’s influence over the country’s economic policies and resources.​ [Modern Diplomacy]

Figure 5: Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and Chinese President Xi Jinping during visit to Beijing. Source: © 2024 X.

Recognizing the unsustainable nature of its debt, Venezuela has sought to restructure its financial obligations with the help of international institutions. However, the lack of transparency and the complex nature of the debt agreements with China have posed significant challenges. The international community, including organizations like the IMF and World Bank, have called for more transparent and efficient debt restructuring processes to address these issues and support Venezuela’s economic recovery​. [Center For Global Development,​ Hudson Institute]

Venezuela’s experience with the BRI highlights the broader strategic risks associated with Chinese investments in Latin America. The heavy debt burdens and control over key resources by Chinese companies pose significant challenges to national sovereignty and economic stability. Venezuela demonstrates the potential pitfalls of Chinese investments and the importance of fostering economic resilience and independence in Latin American countries.

Peru: BRI Projects in Mining and Infrastructure

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has significantly impacted Peru’s mining sector. Peru, rich in minerals such as copper and zinc, has become a crucial supplier of raw materials to China. This relationship has seen China become Peru’s largest trading partner and primary investor, particularly in mining infrastructure. The need for raw materials to fuel China’s industrial and technological advancements has driven substantial Chinese investments in Peru.​ [CEE del Ejército del Perú,​​ Carbon Brief]

Beyond mining, Chinese investments have expanded into large-scale infrastructure projects. Notable among these is the development of port infrastructure in Chancay and Arequipa (see Figure 6). These ports are strategically important as they facilitate the efficient export of raw materials and the import of Chinese goods. This infrastructure development not only supports China’s logistical needs but also integrates Peru more closely into the global supply chains dominated by Chinese enterprises.​ [CEE del Ejército del Perú]

Figure 6: Chinese mega port construction project in Chancay, Peru. Source: © 2024 AP.

While these investments have spurred economic growth, they raise concerns regarding sovereignty and environmental impact. The terms of opacity of Chinese loans and investments has led to fears about long-term economic dependency and control over national resources. These projects also raise significant environmental concerns, since Chinese mining and infrastructure projects have historically led to ecological degradation and social unrest among local communities.​ [CEE del Ejército del Perú,​​ Oxford Business Group]

The debt incurred from these projects also poses a substantial risk to Peru’s economic stability. The financial obligations tied to BRI investments generally lead to a form of debt diplomacy, where countries are pressured into policy decisions favoring Chinese interests. This dynamic is evident in the substantial Chinese control over key infrastructure, which could limit Peru’s ability to independently manage its resources and economic policies, as seen by other countries.​ [Carbon Brief]

Peru’s deepening economic ties with China under the BRI highlight the strategic necessity of offering viable financial and developmental alternatives. Peru’s engagements with the BRI demonstrate that while Chinese investments bring economic benefits, they also challenge to national sovereignty, environmental sustainability, and economic independence. [Carbon Brief,​​ Oxford Business Group]


Economic Influence and Sovereignty Risks: China’s extensive investments and loans under the BRI framework can lead to significant debt burdens for host countries, creating dependencies that compromise national sovereignty. The opaque terms and conditions of these financial agreements often favor Chinese strategic interests, allowing Beijing to exert substantial economic and political influence. This influence can undermine democratic governance and economic independence in Latin America​. [Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations]

Military and Security Concerns: The BRI’s infrastructure projects are not just economic in nature but also have strategic military implications. Increased Chinese presence and control over critical infrastructure, such as ports and telecommunications networks, provide Beijing with greater power-projection capabilities. This shift in control can disrupt regional stability and limit Western military and strategic options in these areas.​ See our previous blog on Chinese port projects in Djibouti. [Council on Foreign Relations,​​ Brookings]

Technological and Standards Domination: China’s ability to set technical standards through its infrastructure projects can disadvantage Western companies and lock countries into Chinese technology ecosystems. This dominance in standards setting could lead to long-term economic and security risks for the West, as it could reduce the influence of Western companies and technologies in global markets​. [Council on Foreign Relations, IISS]

Environmental and Social Impacts: Many BRI projects have faced criticism for their environmental and social impacts. Projects often proceed with little regard for environmental sustainability, leading to ecological degradation and social unrest in host countries. Addressing these issues is crucial for maintaining regional stability and protecting the interests of local communities​. [Atlantic Council,​ Brookings]

Given the strategic implications of China’s BRI, persistent and comprehensive monitoring is essential for informed decision-making and strategic planning. 3GIMBALS’ OMEN solution offers a robust platform for tracking and analyzing Chinese investments and projects globally. OMEN provides critical insights that enable stakeholders to understand the scope and impact of Chinese activities in real-time, enhancing the ability to respond effectively to emerging challenges.

By leveraging the capabilities of OMEN, organizations can:

  1. Monitor Developments: Gain real-time insights into Chinese infrastructure projects and investments, understanding their implications for regional stability and strategic interests.
  2. Analyze Trends: Identify patterns and trends in Chinese economic and geopolitical strategies, enabling proactive responses to potential risks.
  3. Support Decision-Making: Provide data-driven analysis to support policy decisions and strategic initiatives aimed at countering the influence of the BRI.
  4. Enhance Transparency: Improve transparency and accountability in infrastructure financing, helping to promote sustainable and equitable development practices.

Curious? Read more

We saw you looking. Contact us.